Questions about past due assessments, collection fees and liens almost always include a statement the inquirer did not receive notice. Not having your correct mailing address on file with the association puts the liability on you. Just like not signing for the certified letter is on you and the association will receive it back marked "UNCLAIMED."
If you are going to dispute any charges, here is my advice:
Pay off the lien first and then bring a separate action for recovery of any fees if the association violated your due process rights. Never risk the loss of your property to prove a point or fight over improper fees.
Hire a HOA/condo lawyer to audit the fees and bring any possible action. You need someone who is experienced not only in this area of the law, but the industry practices.
Saturday, May 23, 2015
Tenants Attending HOA Meetings!
A common question I run into involves HOAs and condo associations (COAs) denying tenants attendance at meetings. This is a big mistake for the associations.
The problem started with revisions to the Florida Statutes. Years ago Chapter 720 (HOAs) and Chapter 718 (COAs) used to provide rights for the members or "their authorized representatives" to attend meetings. Over the years revisions to the statutes removed that language and the HOAs now erroneously believe they can ban non-owners from meetings.
This thinking runs afoul of the Fair Housing Act because Fla. Stat. 720.305(1) requires members, their tenants, guests and invitees to all comply with the governing documents and Chapter 720. The FHA requires associations to provide those governed by the HOA access to attend meetings
The problem started with revisions to the Florida Statutes. Years ago Chapter 720 (HOAs) and Chapter 718 (COAs) used to provide rights for the members or "their authorized representatives" to attend meetings. Over the years revisions to the statutes removed that language and the HOAs now erroneously believe they can ban non-owners from meetings.
This thinking runs afoul of the Fair Housing Act because Fla. Stat. 720.305(1) requires members, their tenants, guests and invitees to all comply with the governing documents and Chapter 720. The FHA requires associations to provide those governed by the HOA access to attend meetings
Tuesday, May 19, 2015
HOA Rant
There is a great article posted on CyberCitizens for Justice yesterday. It's a rant from Lindsey Nesmith in an article she wrote which printed in the Florida Weekly. My hat is off to Ms. Nesmith for saying the obvious, but what many of us are afraid to say.
You can read the article at: http://www.ccfj.net/HOARANT.html
You can read the article at: http://www.ccfj.net/HOARANT.html
Wednesday, April 15, 2015
How An Association Can Get Into Trouble Over Assessments - BOARD MEMBERS PAY ATTENTION!
With the volatile economy more and more associations are changing property management firms and law firms, but there are some problems which can arise and the association would probably be on the losing end of litigation.
Many owners contact me because their associations have made these changes and now they are unable to pay their assessments because the information regarding where to send payments is not timely distributed to the members. When a member's check or electronic payment is returned, this is a refusal of a tendered payment, which is not permitted by Florida law. Should the association attempt to lien and foreclose, the member not only has a valid defense, but could also bring a counter claim for breach of contract.
It is imperative for associations to notify their members immediately of any changes to make sure payments are not being rejected.
Wednesday, February 25, 2015
Change Your Address with the Association!!
All too often I am asked for advice on dealing with associations filing a lien or foreclosing on a home and the first statement the homeowner makes is "I never received a notice." Unfortunately, rarely will that work as a defense to save your home from being sold at a foreclosure auction by your association.
You have to give your association your address where you receive your mail! It's foolish to think if you don't update your address to get notices and payment coupons a judge not order a sale of your home. You have a duty to notify the association of your most current address. You also have a duty to ask for the amount due if you don't receive a notice or payment coupon. The courts have ruled against homeowners consistently on these issues because if you live in a community that has a sign with the communities name on it at the entrance, you have notice your community is governed by an association and you pay assessments to that association.
Avoiding the mail or a summons does not work either. All the association has to do is prove they mailed the notice to the correct address. If you avoid a summons the courts allow the associations to serve you by publishing a notice in some obscure small newspaper no one reads. Its usually too late by the time you find out you have been served by publication because the court can then enter a default judgment against you. Plus this just adds to the attorney's fees you are required by state law to reimburse the association (that's if you can come up with the money to pay off the demand or judgment and save your home).
The bottom line is don't be foolish. If you can't afford to pay the association, call them and try to make payment arrangements. The association can foreclose on your home quickly and faster than a bank because the association is the original creditor and not a third party who took it by assignment.
Wednesday, December 31, 2014
Pre-Suit Mediation or Not?
A homeowner asked the question on www.avvo.com if moving from the community would mean he no longer needed to provide his HOA with an offer of pre-suit mediation.
Moving would not circumvent the pre-suit mediation requirement because the suit would, I assume, be based on acts that occurred while you were a homeowner. Pre-suit mediation is not just for homeowners either. It covers members, vendors, invitees, licensees, and guests.
Not all disputes require pre-suit mediation. FS 720.311(2)(a) provides:
Disputes between an association and a parcel owner regarding use of or changes to the parcel or the common areas and other covenant enforcement disputes, disputes regarding amendments to the association documents, disputes regarding meetings of the board and committees appointed by the board, membership meetings not including election meetings, and access to the official records of the association shall be the subject of a demand for presuit mediation served by an aggrieved party before the dispute is filed in court.
A dispute over a financial obligation or enforcement of a settlement agreement are not subject to pre-suit mediation. Also, any dispute in which a party seeks an emergency injunction is not subject to pre-suit mediation. It is important to note that what you may think is an emergency is usually not one in the eyes of the court.
I don't recommend going to pre-suit mediation without a lawyer. The HOAs usually have veteran lawyers who are very good at bulldozing over unrepresented parties.
Moving would not circumvent the pre-suit mediation requirement because the suit would, I assume, be based on acts that occurred while you were a homeowner. Pre-suit mediation is not just for homeowners either. It covers members, vendors, invitees, licensees, and guests.
Not all disputes require pre-suit mediation. FS 720.311(2)(a) provides:
Disputes between an association and a parcel owner regarding use of or changes to the parcel or the common areas and other covenant enforcement disputes, disputes regarding amendments to the association documents, disputes regarding meetings of the board and committees appointed by the board, membership meetings not including election meetings, and access to the official records of the association shall be the subject of a demand for presuit mediation served by an aggrieved party before the dispute is filed in court.
A dispute over a financial obligation or enforcement of a settlement agreement are not subject to pre-suit mediation. Also, any dispute in which a party seeks an emergency injunction is not subject to pre-suit mediation. It is important to note that what you may think is an emergency is usually not one in the eyes of the court.
I don't recommend going to pre-suit mediation without a lawyer. The HOAs usually have veteran lawyers who are very good at bulldozing over unrepresented parties.
Revitalization Question
Today I answered a question on www.avvo.com regarding the revitalization process and I think it is important to post the question and my response in this blog for those who do not or have not visited the Avvo website.
Question:
Response:
Here's a crash course on the Marketable Record Title Act (MRTA) and revitalization process governed by Fla. Stat. 720.403 - 720.407:
1. It is possible for the Declarations to be valid against some lots, but not all. The Declarations can be preserved by being specifically referenced in a deed by the Official Record Book and Page Number or by reference to a plat that has the deed restrictions recorded on the plat. An analysis of each lot is required to determine if the deed restrictions have been extinguished by MRTA against that lot because the last reference is more than 30 years old.
2. Revitalization can be used to breathe new life into the Declarations if they have ceased to govern one or more lots.
3. The Declarations have no force and effect against those lots where the deed restrictions have expired and there is no duty to obey the restrictions or pay assessments. If the Declarations are revitalized they are not retroactive -- meaning the HOA cannot go back and collect assessments for the period of time between expiration and revitalization.
4. It takes at least a majority of the homeowners to approve revitalization. It could be more if the Declarations require more than a simple majority to approve amendments to the Declarations.
5. Revitalization is a very strict process which requires the HOA to appoint an organizing committee and to have a court reporter present at a meeting to vote on revitalization. While written consents can be used to gather the votes, if the bylaws and articles of incorporation do not provide for written consent the HOA is required to hold a meeting so homeowners can vote in person or by proxy (if proxies are allowed).
6. If revitalization is approved by the homeowners the HOA has to apply to the Dept. of Economic Opportunity (DEO) for revitalization and, if granted by DEO, re-record the Declarations, index them against each lot and deliver a copy of the revitalized Declarations to each homeowner. The revitalized Declarations cannot be more restrictive than the original Declarations, although there are a few exceptions in the statute.
To answer your question, in the interim the HOA still has bylaws and articles of incorporation which must be honored, including having elections and annual meetings.
The revitalization statute was recorded in 2004. My opinion is this statute presents a constitutional issue on property rights and contract impairment for anyone who purchased their property before the statute was enacted. Statutes cannot be applied retroactively to change existing contracts and the Declarations, bylaws and articles are contracts between the HOA and the homeowner. This issue has not, to my knowledge, been litigated.
If you feel your HOA is not following the procedures for revitalization properly you should consult with a HOA lawyer for an opinion. If revitalization is granted by DEO and you feel the HOA did not follow the procedures in the statute and any requirements in the Declarations, bylaws and articles (which is required by the revitalization statute), you have a very short period of time to petition DEO for an administrative hearing to challenge the revitalization.
Question:
Our HOA's CC&R's have expired and an attempt is being made to revitalize the Declaration. In the interim, I am told we are a voluntary association and a not-for-profit corporation governed under FS617.
Can the previous Board simply "take over" the corporation and run it without ratification by the owners? There is no confidence in the current Board and their continuing possession of documents, control over Management Company and bank accounts is regarded as hostile. Do owner/shareholders have a right to reorganize under any law?
Response:
Here's a crash course on the Marketable Record Title Act (MRTA) and revitalization process governed by Fla. Stat. 720.403 - 720.407:
1. It is possible for the Declarations to be valid against some lots, but not all. The Declarations can be preserved by being specifically referenced in a deed by the Official Record Book and Page Number or by reference to a plat that has the deed restrictions recorded on the plat. An analysis of each lot is required to determine if the deed restrictions have been extinguished by MRTA against that lot because the last reference is more than 30 years old.
2. Revitalization can be used to breathe new life into the Declarations if they have ceased to govern one or more lots.
3. The Declarations have no force and effect against those lots where the deed restrictions have expired and there is no duty to obey the restrictions or pay assessments. If the Declarations are revitalized they are not retroactive -- meaning the HOA cannot go back and collect assessments for the period of time between expiration and revitalization.
4. It takes at least a majority of the homeowners to approve revitalization. It could be more if the Declarations require more than a simple majority to approve amendments to the Declarations.
5. Revitalization is a very strict process which requires the HOA to appoint an organizing committee and to have a court reporter present at a meeting to vote on revitalization. While written consents can be used to gather the votes, if the bylaws and articles of incorporation do not provide for written consent the HOA is required to hold a meeting so homeowners can vote in person or by proxy (if proxies are allowed).
6. If revitalization is approved by the homeowners the HOA has to apply to the Dept. of Economic Opportunity (DEO) for revitalization and, if granted by DEO, re-record the Declarations, index them against each lot and deliver a copy of the revitalized Declarations to each homeowner. The revitalized Declarations cannot be more restrictive than the original Declarations, although there are a few exceptions in the statute.
To answer your question, in the interim the HOA still has bylaws and articles of incorporation which must be honored, including having elections and annual meetings.
The revitalization statute was recorded in 2004. My opinion is this statute presents a constitutional issue on property rights and contract impairment for anyone who purchased their property before the statute was enacted. Statutes cannot be applied retroactively to change existing contracts and the Declarations, bylaws and articles are contracts between the HOA and the homeowner. This issue has not, to my knowledge, been litigated.
If you feel your HOA is not following the procedures for revitalization properly you should consult with a HOA lawyer for an opinion. If revitalization is granted by DEO and you feel the HOA did not follow the procedures in the statute and any requirements in the Declarations, bylaws and articles (which is required by the revitalization statute), you have a very short period of time to petition DEO for an administrative hearing to challenge the revitalization.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)