Association Collections and Bankruptcy - Info for Board Members

One of the biggest issues facing associations is the ability to collect from delinquent owners who have filed bankruptcy.   It is critical an association has an attorney experienced in creditor bankruptcy law in order to avoid waiving the right to collect those assessments from the delinquent owners, which often is thousands of dollars.  Below is some general guidance for associations:

• Whenever the association receives notice an owner has filed bankruptcy, immediately send the notice to the association attorney, who should file a claim with the bankruptcy court on behalf of the association.  Make sure the claim is filed.  For some reason not all attorneys file these claims on behalf of associations.

• The bankruptcy court issues an "automatic stay," meaning the association cannot contact the owner to collect a debt.  Leave the collections to the association attorney.

• Owners have a duty to pay assessments as they come due after filing.  If the owner does not pay, notify the association attorney, who can file a motion to lift the automatic stay.

• Bankruptcy does not mean the past due assessments cannot be collected. It simply means the association cannot go after the owner personally by garnishing wages or other collection measures.  The association can still foreclose on the property "in rem," meaning against the property only, not "in personam," which is against the person.

• Delinquent owners can strip the association lien in a Chapter 13 bankruptcy if the first mortgage exceeds the value of the property.  It is important for the association attorney to monitor the case and properly object to lien stripping.  There has to be a credible valuation of the property with a thorough survey.

• If the bankruptcy case is dismissed, the automatic stay is lifted, usually 15 days after the order is entered, and the association can pursue it assessments, interest, late fees, attorneys' fees and costs as normal.

Transparency in Community Associations

It's been quite the busy year so far, so I apologize my blog posts have been few and far between.  Trying to make a difference in Florida community associations is a major task, but comes with some rewards. Our firm was again a winner of the Florida Community Association Journal's Readers' Choice Awards.

The topic for today's blog is transparency.  Transparency is a good thing.  Associations should recognize if they want their members to pay their assessments on time, keep their property maintained and volunteer to help the community, then transparency is the place to start.  The Florida Legislature has started pushing for this with the recent legislative updates to the Condominium Act, Chapter 718, Florida Statutes, by requiring condominium associations with 150 units or more to have a website and post a good number of the official records on the website.  This statute has not been enacted in Chapter 720 governing homeowner associations, but maybe we will see this in the future.

Some of the biggest complaints I hear from homeowners are about transparency --  the HOA will not provide them copies of the records, the records are not easily obtained, the HOA is hiding something.  Now I will be the first to admit this is a red flag for me and I suspect something fishy is going on with the money if the HOA is fighting too hard to keep the members from seeing the financials.  I also recognize some board members do not understand their duties, do not know what records to keep or how to keep them, which records can be disclosed and not disclosed, or how to set up a website to store the documents so members can see them without going through the certified letter, return receipt process.  Those are the HOAs I am eager to represent so I can train their board members on the right protocol.  

The homeowners need to understand the HOA has no duty to respond to a request to send copies to them.  There is a duty to provide access to the official records and allow the members to make copies at the inspection.  

Often this request makes even honest board members suspicious.  It's only natural to get defensive when a request is received and perceived as an attempt to catch you doing something wrong.  And board members make mistakes while homeowners tend to accuse them of intentional wrong-doing.  If everyone would just be respectful of each other and act in a civil manner a good number of these disputes would not even be disputes.

My advice is:

• HOAs put your official records on a website if possible or set up one of the free software applications like Google Docs or Dropbox to share documents with members.  Not only is it easier, but it takes out the possibility of confrontations if one side just can't be civil and respectful.

• Homeowners use the certified letter, return receipt in order to obtain access to records so that you document your request and everyone knows the deadline (10 business days from the date the receipt is signed).  Also, make your request clear and if possible exact.  Asking for "all official records" is your legal right, but it is creates some difficulties because the HOA may have boxes and boxes of records which you will have to go through and may be required to pay for a management person to assist in going through with you.  In addition, it comes across as a fishing expedition and like all fishing trips, you may have to keep casting lots of times before you get the fish you want.  If you are looking for a specific financial transaction, narrow down the description of your request.

• HOAs remember you cannot ask the homeowner why they want the document.

• Everyone keep in mind the HOA does not have to produce a document it does not have.  This means no creating special reports if the reports are not used in the normal course of running the HOA.  If there is a document the HOA should have and can reasonably obtain it without any undue hardship, then the HOA should get it after the first request so it is available should a second request be made for that document.

Rental Restrictions

A popular topic among association dwellers is the right of an association to restrict rental of property.  This is one of the areas where it is important to distinguish between a COA (condo association) and a HOA (single family homes).  Each association is governed by different laws.  Fla. Stat. Chapter 718 governs COAs and Fla. Stat. Chapter 720 governs HOAs.

Condo rental restrictions are common and receive the most attention.  A few years back a judicial ruling supported condo rental restrictions which were created by a membership vote, noting when a person buys a condo they are on notice the rules and restrictions of the COA can be amended.  In response to the ruling, the Florida Legislature enacted Fla. Stat. §718.110(13), which states any amendment to restrict rentals is only effective against those owners who voted for the amended and those purchasing property after the amendment is recorded.

HOAs have traditionally been treated differently than COAs when it comes to rental restrictions.  The reason being COAs have members living in very close proximity to each other whereas a majority of HOAs have stand alone housing (the exception being townhomes, which are more like condos, but formed as HOAs).

The court cases involving HOAs have for the most part ruled the right to sell, lease or otherwise transfer property is a vested right which cannot be taken away without consent of the owner.  A vested right is any right which would be a deal-breaker for the reasonable buyer if the rule prohibiting it were in existence at the time of purchase.  In other words, if the restriction existed when you were considering your purchase you would have not purchased the property.  

The issue members of HOAs have in asserting this right is the rulings are at the appellate level and if an owner does not know to argue this at the trial level and cite the appellate rulings, the judges will consider the condo rulings because the HOA lawyers will use those to promote their position the HOA can create rental restrictions.

The lack of a significant amount of case law governing HOAs means judges and lawyers turn to the condo cases for guidance.  In a majority of the issues, the law is the same, but there are still differences between the two.  This is why it is important to have a lawyer for these types of cases and one that is experienced in HOA and condo law.  Not only are there nuances in the law, but both types of associations have special procedures for litigating.

What's Constitutes A Board Meeting?

Board meetings are a big source of complaints when it comes to HOAs and condo associations.  Fla. Stat. 718.111 governs BOD meetings of condo associations or COAs and Fla. Stat. 720.303(2) governs meetings of HOAs or homeowner associations.

There must be a quorum (majority) of the BOD present in person (or by telephone conference as long as the attendees can hear the member appearing by phone or Skype) in order to have a board meeting and to conduct board business.  Secret voting and proxies are not allowed for board members to vote or attend.  If there is not a quorum present, then the BOD cannot conduct business and any actions would be null and void.  It would also be a breach of fiduciary duty to conduct a meeting without a quorum.

You are entitled to record all board meetings and the board cannot prohibit this.  They also cannot ask why you are recording.  If a board meeting is being conducted in violation of the statutes, you should record the meeting and object to the meeting being conducted.

Declarations, Bylaws & Articles of Incorporation

Fla. Stat. 720.305(c) of the Homeowners Association Act limits the cost of copies to $0.50 per page unless they have to send them out to be copied, in which case they can charge a reasonable fee for staff to bring the documents to a vendor for copying. The same statute requires them to keep sufficient copies of the governing documents (Declarations, Bylaws, Articles of Incorporation) on hand to provide members with copies. While the statute doesn't outright say these documents must be provided free of charge, industry practice has been to provide them for free.

You could always go online and download them for free. Search on your county's "Official Records" and once you're on the website search by your association's name. You will also want to restrict the search to Condo documents, restrictions, plat-related, and assignments so you don't get too many results.

You should check them online anyway to make sure you have the latest documents and they are recorded. There are many associations that do not reord their documents, either due to an oversight or because they isn't get member approval, but they will enforce these documents as if they are recorded because most of the time they can get away with it without anyone challenging them.

If you are in a condo association, Fla. Stat. 718.112 has a similar provision.

HOA & Condo Liens - Saving Your Home

Frequently I am asked to help homeowners settle their past due assessments with their condo or homeowners association. This is a very serious situation because the association can and will foreclose much faster than any mortgage company or bank.

Frequently homeowners make the mistake of assuming that 1) if the mortgage company or bank is foreclosing, the association cannot; 2) if the homeowner pays the past due assessments, but not the interest, late fees or attorneys' fees, the association cannot foreclose; 3) sending a check to the property manager will stop the foreclosure; 4) the homeowner can withhold assessments if the association is not doing their job and 5) the association can waive some of the past due assessments and charges.

These are all incorrect and a big mistake. Trying to get around these issues will only increase the attorneys' fees and other charges the association is entitled by law to correct.

It is very important to note that BY LAW, any payments are applied to attorneys' fees and costs FIRST, interest and late fees NEXT and assessments LAST. Unless you pay the full amount being demanded, you will always be past due in assessments and the association can foreclose.

Your options, if you cannot pay the full amount demanded, are:

1) Negotiate a payment plan;

2) File Chapter 13 bankruptcy.

The first option may not be the ideal solution because many association law firms charge $250 to set up the payment plan and $50 per month to process payments, which adds considerably to the amount due and owing.

Chapter 7 bankruptcy is not an option for saving the home. The discharge of association assessments in a Chapter 7 applies only to assessments that came due prior to filing bankruptcy and only extinguish the debt to the person, not the property. This means the association can still foreclose against the property. Also, the homeowner is still liable for assessments that come due after filing bankruptcy.

If a homeowner wants to avoid the foreclosure of the pre-petition assessment lien, the homeowner will have to pay off the pre-petition debt (either in full or through a settlement with the association) even though that debt has been discharged, or file a Chapter 13 bankruptcy which will allow the homeowner to spread the debt over a five-year payment plan. The association may or may not be entitled to 100% of the charges and if the association fails to file a claim, they will not receive any pre-petition assessments and charges.