Association Collections and Bankruptcy - Info for Board Members

One of the biggest issues facing associations is the ability to collect from delinquent owners who have filed bankruptcy.   It is critical an association has an attorney experienced in creditor bankruptcy law in order to avoid waiving the right to collect those assessments from the delinquent owners, which often is thousands of dollars.  Below is some general guidance for associations:

• Whenever the association receives notice an owner has filed bankruptcy, immediately send the notice to the association attorney, who should file a claim with the bankruptcy court on behalf of the association.  Make sure the claim is filed.  For some reason not all attorneys file these claims on behalf of associations.

• The bankruptcy court issues an "automatic stay," meaning the association cannot contact the owner to collect a debt.  Leave the collections to the association attorney.

• Owners have a duty to pay assessments as they come due after filing.  If the owner does not pay, notify the association attorney, who can file a motion to lift the automatic stay.

• Bankruptcy does not mean the past due assessments cannot be collected. It simply means the association cannot go after the owner personally by garnishing wages or other collection measures.  The association can still foreclose on the property "in rem," meaning against the property only, not "in personam," which is against the person.

• Delinquent owners can strip the association lien in a Chapter 13 bankruptcy if the first mortgage exceeds the value of the property.  It is important for the association attorney to monitor the case and properly object to lien stripping.  There has to be a credible valuation of the property with a thorough survey.

• If the bankruptcy case is dismissed, the automatic stay is lifted, usually 15 days after the order is entered, and the association can pursue it assessments, interest, late fees, attorneys' fees and costs as normal.

Revitalization Question

Today I answered a question on www.avvo.com regarding the revitalization process and I think it is important to post the question and my response in this blog for those who do not or have not visited the Avvo website.

Question:

Our HOA's CC&R's have expired and an attempt is being made to revitalize the Declaration. In the interim, I am told we are a voluntary association and a not-for-profit corporation governed under FS617. 

Can the previous Board simply "take over" the corporation and run it without ratification by the owners? There is no confidence in the current Board and their continuing possession of documents, control over Management Company and bank accounts is regarded as hostile. Do owner/shareholders have a right to reorganize under any law?

Response: 

Here's a crash course on the Marketable Record Title Act (MRTA) and revitalization process governed by Fla. Stat. 720.403 - 720.407: 

1. It is possible for the Declarations to be valid against some lots, but not all. The Declarations can be preserved by being specifically referenced in a deed by the Official Record Book and Page Number or by reference to a plat that has the deed restrictions recorded on the plat. An analysis of each lot is required to determine if the deed restrictions have been extinguished by MRTA against that lot because the last reference is more than 30 years old. 

2. Revitalization can be used to breathe new life into the Declarations if they have ceased to govern one or more lots. 

3. The Declarations have no force and effect against those lots where the deed restrictions have expired and there is no duty to obey the restrictions or pay assessments. If the Declarations are revitalized they are not retroactive -- meaning the HOA cannot go back and collect assessments for the period of time between expiration and revitalization. 

4. It takes at least a majority of the homeowners to approve revitalization. It could be more if the Declarations require more than a simple majority to approve amendments to the Declarations. 

5. Revitalization is a very strict process which requires the HOA to appoint an organizing committee and to have a court reporter present at a meeting to vote on revitalization. While written consents can be used to gather the votes, if the bylaws and articles of incorporation do not provide for written consent the HOA is required to hold a meeting so homeowners can vote in person or by proxy (if proxies are allowed). 

6. If revitalization is approved by the homeowners the HOA has to apply to the Dept. of Economic Opportunity (DEO) for revitalization and, if granted by DEO, re-record the Declarations, index them against each lot and deliver a copy of the revitalized Declarations to each homeowner. The revitalized Declarations cannot be more restrictive than the original Declarations, although there are a few exceptions in the statute. 

To answer your question, in the interim the HOA still has bylaws and articles of incorporation which must be honored, including having elections and annual meetings. 

The revitalization statute was recorded in 2004. My opinion is this statute presents a constitutional issue on property rights and contract impairment for anyone who purchased their property before the statute was enacted. Statutes cannot be applied retroactively to change existing contracts and the Declarations, bylaws and articles are contracts between the HOA and the homeowner. This issue has not, to my knowledge, been litigated. 

If you feel your HOA is not following the procedures for revitalization properly you should consult with a HOA lawyer for an opinion. If revitalization is granted by DEO and you feel the HOA did not follow the procedures in the statute and any requirements in the Declarations, bylaws and articles (which is required by the revitalization statute), you have a very short period of time to petition DEO for an administrative hearing to challenge the revitalization.

HOAs - Don't Mess with the Disabled!!!

It's that time of year when all the community association law firms start blogging about the legislative updates to the Florida Statutes that will be enacted July 1, 2014.  It's interesting to read the various blogs because they always include what the writer interprets the meaning of the new statute will be and, if you read more than one blog, you get a more than one interpretation (flag on the play -- litigation imminent!).

Here's one that should be real clear and I credit John and Kim Whitt for standing firm and seeking justice. They proposed to our elected leaders to add two words to Fla. Stat. 720.303(2), which requires meetings to be open to all members. Those two words "and accessible" make a world of difference to people like John who is confined to a wheelchair.  Common sense and compassion for other human beings would lead you to think this is not necessary; after all, the Fair Housing Act requires HOAs to provide reasonable accommodations for those who request it in order to attend meetings. Well, no one goes around accusing HOA board members of using common sense with any regularity.  In fact, all I hear all day is about conduct that is not only senseless, but unreasonable, offensive, insensitive and ruthless.  But I digress.  While those two words didn't make it into the statute, a version of it did:  "A meeting of the board must be held at a location that is accessible to a physically handicapped person if requested by a physically

handicapped person who has a right to attend the meeting."

This was no simple task and I congratulate the Whitts and our political leaders for accomplishing this. At this point I bet you're wondering what led to this.  I am here to tell their story -- the real story.  Not some version with a spin on it to make the people think it was an innocent mistake.

John and Kim Whitt are wonderful people.  They are nice people.  They are not troublemakers.  When they bought their home in 2009 in a beautiful, rural community in Pasco County life for them changed. The community is comprised of 45 or so well-kept spacious homes on spacious lots, many of which are adjacent to wetlands.  Everyone's dream home, right?  The Whitts were eager to be involved in the community and to get to know their neighbors.  One obstacle faced them.  The HOA held it's meetings, as it did for a number of years, in a vacant lot with a cattle grate, livestock fence and extremely soft soil.  The meetings are held in a far back corner under trees with roots that made it impossible and still make it impossible for John to attend the meetings.  John asked the board if the meetings, not all, but at least some, could be held somewhere so he could attend and even offered his house.  He was refused.  A former board member, who is a contractor, offered to install a concrete pad a no charge to accommodate John's request.  The board voted against this. Of course in their version they offered to install the concrete pad and John refused, but that's just the usual HOA spin on facts to try and get people to believe they meant well.  John even offered the HOA to remove him from membership and the deed restrictions so the HOA would not have to comply. It's not like he was going to start a pig farm at his beautiful home.  Pig farms are prohibited by zoning ordinances in this area, but more on that later.  The HOA spins the tale the Whitts never wanted to be part of the community and when their request to be excused was denied they resorted to pushing the access to meetings as the issue.

Here we are five years later. The Whitts sued the HOA, but lost. I won't rant about that until I'm ready to relinquish my license to practice law.  The former board member/contractor and two other couples who own homes in the community sued the HOA because the deed restrictions had expired while the Whitts were litigating and were not properly amended to extend them.  They won on summary judgment.  No HOA.  The HOA is appealing, but going through the revitalization process as the same time. They are promoting revitalization by claiming if the deed restrictions are not revitalized they will be a community with pig farms.  I don't think any of the owners have a pot-bellied pig, much less a pig farm, which is illegal in this particular area anyway.  On top of that, the HOA has held the Whitts out in ill will to the neighbors every chance they get, blaming them for the high legal fees they incurred with a huge unpaid balance.  No one really knows what that balance is because not only will they not show the owners the amount due and the balance changes frequently.  If they think the HOA won, how come they owe so much money in legal fees?  

The Whitts may have lost the case, but evidently a lot of people, including members of the Florida Legislature and some decent people in their community, thought they shouldn't.  They were successful in getting the statute amended despite the HOA attorney saying they wanted to create the "Homeowners Association with Disabilities Act."  They have suffered for it.  Homeowners in their community who do not even know them despise them based on the tale the HOA spins about this -- a HOA that has been ruled to not have deed restrictions.  

And just for giggles -- the HOA now claims it is still a mandatory association without deed restrictions because the Articles of Incorporation and the Bylaws are still valid.  

Associations -- There is a Better Way!

It's no secret I have been an advocate for homeowners embroiled in disputes with their associations.  I originally went to law school to practice employment law.  I changed directions when I bought my home in a HOA and my welcome to the neighborhood consisted of a volley of "f-bombs" from someone claiming to be the HOA president.

In the past couple of years I have changed direction in my practice of community association law.  Not only did I realize individual owners suing an association is difficult for my clients, both emotionally and financially, but creates a hostile environment for everyone that often lingers even after the dispute is resolved. I now focus my attention on representing the associations.  I figure I can make a difference by helping associations proactively avoid litigation rather than helping the owners litigate.  Not all disputes can avoid litigation. There will always be those one or two homeowners in every community that will be stubborn or even aggressive and want to fight, but litigation should be a last resort.

Let's face it -- if your association has a bad reputation it will affect property values and the resale of homes. Desirable associations attract home buyers.

The ingredients for a good association are education, communication, the right CAM and the right lawyer.

Most homeowners do not intentionally violate the covenants.  Just because the homeowner received a copy of the governing documents, doesn't mean they understand them.  If they did, most members who are past due in their assessments would realize the association can lien and foreclose on their home and would keep the assessments current.  I come across homeowners every day who believe if the bank is foreclosing the association cannot foreclose.  They are surprised when their homes are sold by the association with a bank foreclosure pending.

There is a simple fix to this.  The association should have a website the provisions of the governing documents can be explained, broken down in individual topics, and then promote this website regularly. Make sure new owners receive the web address right away.  Encourage members to review the website before undertaking improvements to property.  There are a number of services out there which help those technology-challenged individuals build a website.  If a website isn't feasible, create a newsletter!  Now you have education and communication!

Another point about communications -- confrontational notices do not work.  It is human nature to become defensive when being harshly reprimanded.  I believe the first notice to a homeowner should be a gentle reminder and an invitation to discuss the issue at a meeting if necessary.  The old saying "you catch more flies with honey" is true. You will get more owner cooperation if you acknowledge they either did not know better or forgot and have a chance to remedy the situation.  Threatening to send them to the association lawyer if they do not obey demands only ends up costing the association and owners more money for legal fees.

The right CAM is important.  Identifying the right CAM is not so easy and there is no one size fits all.  Some associations need the CAM to be very involved and some only need a CAM to collect assessments, pay bills and send out violation notices.  The right CAM will meet your expectations and work well with the association.  The wrong CAM will partner with the lawyer to increase billable hours for both of them by fueling disputes.  The wrong CAM will control the association funds and keep board members out of financial decisions.  The wrong CAM will make board decisions without the board members being involved. The wrong CAM will think it's their job to run the association, not the board.  

The same applies to the lawyers.  The right lawyer will answer the board's questions and encourage the resolution of disputes early.  The wrong lawyer will lead the board to believe they have the ultimate power and cannot lose a dispute. The wrong lawyer will bully and abuse homeowners.

Associations should be proactive when dealing with violations and collections.  Identify the problem areas and work on them proactively.  Make sure your owners know not paying assessments means they risk losing their home and usually quickly.  Let them know the association doesn't want their home, but has a duty to collect assessments from everyone.  Let them know financial hardship is not a defense the courts will entertain.  Offer a payment plan to help out those who are already past due, but be aware that if the association lawyer handles the payment there are outrageous fees to set it up and process payments.  The association can facilitate the payment plan so it stands a better chance of success.  If your association has authority to impose fines, make sure the members know about the process and don't try to rig it by appointing members to the fining committee who are friends and supporters of the board or biased against the owner.  Make it a fair hearing before the fining committee or the association will most likely end up in litigation.  Make sure all members are aware of the process for applying for approval to implement improvements to their property.  Communicate on a regular basis those items that require approval as well as those that do not.  

There is a better way to have an association and not make everyone in it miserable.  It's not easy because most members of the association don't care to be involved or hear about it, but it is possible.

Community Association Managers (CAMs)

Laws Regulating CAMs

Fla. Stat. 468.431 requires a CAM to be licensed when "the association served contains more than 10 units or have an annual budget or budgets in excess of $100,000." The management firm is required to have a license as well. CAMs are limited in what duties they can perform by statute as well as an advisory opinion issued by the Florida Supreme Court. 

The advisory opinion has designated activities which would constitute the unlicensed practice of law, such as drafting amendments to documents, drafting proxies, preparing liens, advising anyone how the law applies to a set of facts or circumstances, interpreting statutes, administrative code, the governing documents of an association or contracts, drafting contracts or drafting legal notices. CAMs are licensed and regulated by the Department of Business and Professional Regulation ("DBPR"). Effective July 1, 2013 laws were enacted to create more regulation of CAMs and penalties for violating the regulations. A CAM can be subject to penalties for any violation of Chapters 718, 719 and 720 of the Florida Statutes.

But the Real Problem Is.....

There seems to be a rise in the number of complaints I hear from associations who state their CAM who make decisions without consulting the Board of Directors ("BOD") or take actions against homeowners without BOD approval. I frequently come across liens and foreclosures for trivial amounts against homes which the BOD will claim they did not authorize. I often expect the BOD is not being honest and is throwing the CAM under the bus, but there have been some instances I have investigated where the lien or foreclosure is not in any meeting minutes and the CAM made the decision on their own. I have heard from several associations the CAM handles all the finances, including which bills to pay and when. I have even come across associations claiming the CAM will not let them have access to the association funds. Even more troubling is when the CAM is making board decisions without input from the BOD. The courts have judicially dissolved associations which delegate the board duties to a CAM. It rarely happens, but has happened. Or worse yet, the court can appoint a receiver, which makes assessments skyrocket. Board members need to know their fiduciary duty is to operate and manage the association, including making financial decisions and signing checks. If no one is watching the checkbook except for the person who gets paid regularly with checks, you are not doing your duty! Don't get me wrong -- there are some wonderful CAMs out there, but the BOD should know what their CAM is doing because the association is responsible for the CAMs actions.

Single Biggest Mistake Is.....

Whenever there is a turnover of board members due to an election or other events, the CAMs are naturally concerned because the new BOD can terminate their contract. All too often I come across CAMs who will continue to work with the former BOD to try and oust the new BOD. I have seen CAMs sabotage records and meetings and provide former board members with privileged documents. I have seen CAMs try to circumvent the election process. Associations need to know if their CAM is engaging in this behavior the association needs to replace the CAM because the potential risk of litigation against the association is high in these situations.

Conclusion

Board members need to communicate with their CAMs at the slightest hint of these problems. Sometimes the BOD is sending mixed signals and the CAM needs clear instructions. Anytime there is a change in board members, the board should meet with the CAM to discuss expectations. If something does happen, the board should provide the CAM with a letter outlining the situation and an opportunity to cure the situation. The BOD-CAM relationship is supposed to be a partnership and not a battle of egos.

Time to Pay Assessments - Even If You Don't Receive a Bill

One of the biggest issues my clients have with their associations is past due assessments because they did not receive a bill from the association.   Don't make the mistake of thinking you have a defense if they do not send out a bill.  The state laws protect associations and do not require them to send the bill.

Florida courts have ruled an owner is on notice of assessments due by virtue of purchasing property subject to an association and it is the duty of the owner to make sure those assessments are paid.  If you have not received your bill for your assessments, it is your duty to contact the association to find out if the amount has changed and to remit payment.

Also, remember -- the association is entitled by law to all interest, late fees and attorneys' fees and costs if you are past due.  IF YOU HAVE BEEN TURNED OVER TO THE ASSOCIATION ATTORNEY FOR COLLECTION, SEND PAYMENT TO THE ASSOCIATION ATTORNEY.  Attempting to avoid these fees by sending the assessments to the association directly will only cause you to incur more fees and costs.  The association will either return your payment (even though they are required to accept it) or forward it to the attorney.  No matter how they handle it, by law, the payment is applied to everything but assessments and if there is any leftover then it is applied to assessments.  Until you pay the full amount you will always be past due.

Bottom line -- you cannot get out of paying the assessments because the association may not have sent a bill or, because of mail service, you didn't receive the bill and the association can LIEN and FORECLOSE on your property for non-payment.

Rental Restrictions

A popular topic among association dwellers is the right of an association to restrict rental of property.  This is one of the areas where it is important to distinguish between a COA (condo association) and a HOA (single family homes).  Each association is governed by different laws.  Fla. Stat. Chapter 718 governs COAs and Fla. Stat. Chapter 720 governs HOAs.

Condo rental restrictions are common and receive the most attention.  A few years back a judicial ruling supported condo rental restrictions which were created by a membership vote, noting when a person buys a condo they are on notice the rules and restrictions of the COA can be amended.  In response to the ruling, the Florida Legislature enacted Fla. Stat. §718.110(13), which states any amendment to restrict rentals is only effective against those owners who voted for the amended and those purchasing property after the amendment is recorded.

HOAs have traditionally been treated differently than COAs when it comes to rental restrictions.  The reason being COAs have members living in very close proximity to each other whereas a majority of HOAs have stand alone housing (the exception being townhomes, which are more like condos, but formed as HOAs).

The court cases involving HOAs have for the most part ruled the right to sell, lease or otherwise transfer property is a vested right which cannot be taken away without consent of the owner.  A vested right is any right which would be a deal-breaker for the reasonable buyer if the rule prohibiting it were in existence at the time of purchase.  In other words, if the restriction existed when you were considering your purchase you would have not purchased the property.  

The issue members of HOAs have in asserting this right is the rulings are at the appellate level and if an owner does not know to argue this at the trial level and cite the appellate rulings, the judges will consider the condo rulings because the HOA lawyers will use those to promote their position the HOA can create rental restrictions.

The lack of a significant amount of case law governing HOAs means judges and lawyers turn to the condo cases for guidance.  In a majority of the issues, the law is the same, but there are still differences between the two.  This is why it is important to have a lawyer for these types of cases and one that is experienced in HOA and condo law.  Not only are there nuances in the law, but both types of associations have special procedures for litigating.

Mandatory versus Voluntary - Are You Ruled by a HOA?

Many times I receive questions from people asking if they have a mandatory homeowners association.  What makes an association mandatory?  There are several factors to consider and a complete review of the governing documents of the association are required to provide a definitive answer.  There is no one size fits all answer to this question.

First, in order to create a mandatory association there has to be 100% participation in the association.  That is to say the deed restrictions creating an association must have been recorded before any property was sold to a buyer or any property which was sold would have to sign a consent and joinder agreeing to be a member of the association.  A mandatory association cannot have less than 100% participation because that would mean not everyone is a mandatory member.  

In addition to having recorded deed restrictions, those deed restrictions must include language of the intent to create a mandatory association and preferably contains language assigning the rights to enforce those restrictions and impose assessments from the developer to the association after turnover (i.e., the developer turns over control of the association to the membership).  

Many older deed restrictions do not contain this language and a recorded assignment is required to authorize the association to impose assessments and enforce restrictions.  Many of these older deed restrictions are nothing more than land use restrictions (no livestock, no chainlink fencing, etc.) and do not have language authorizing the creation of an association.  Many associations with these older documents claim to be mandatory and get away with it because homeowners are unaware of the requirements for creating an association.  After 1995 Florida law required associations to record the Declarations (deed restrictions), bylaws and articles of incorporation in the county where the association is located.  Subsequent case law provided unrecorded documents are not binding and enforceable against homeowners because they lack notice of the documents.

A mandatory association can be created after the fact (after the sale of lots) if 100% of the lot owners agree to be bound to the association.

Buying property in a development requires a careful reading of the documents.  Often developers create and record the documents for a mandatory membership, but never actually start the association until it is time to turn it over to the members or sell to a subsequent developer.  Homeowners will be caught unaware when all of a sudden the association comes into existence.  The developer can take up to five years to set up the association as long as the language is in the documents manifesting the intent.  The courts have upheld the validity of associations under these circumstances.

Homeowners should also be careful when there is a missing assignment.  The courts have allowed out-of-business developers to assign their rights to an association long after the developer ceased doing business. There is one case on record in which the developer was allowed to assign the rights eight years after he went out of business.

If you think your association might not actually be a mandatory association, hire a condo/HOA lawyer to review the governing documents (Declarations, Bylaws and Articles of Incorporation), as well as performing a research of the county records to look for missing documents.  If you are thinking of purchasing in a development, pay the extra money to have a review. 

Avoiding Trouble with Your Association

A big source of disputes between owners and their associations concerns claims by the association the owner made changes or improvements to their property or unit without permission of the association. The owners often claim they sent an application to the association and after not receiving a response for more than thirty (30) days, proceeded with the changes or improvements, believing approval was automatic if the association failed to respond.

This is a big mistake! At one time there was a statute providing automatic approval if no response was received and many association documents also contain language for the same, but the dispute arises when the association claims it did not receive the application. The owner must be able to prove the application was submitted. This can be done by submitting all applications by certified mail, return receipt in order to track delivery of the request.

Make sure any approval is in writing. Quite often a board member or property manager will give verbal approval only to deny it later when other board members object.

Also, check your Declarations and Bylaws before assuming no response equates to automatic approval. If there is no language granting automatic approval, then you have to take steps to obtain the written approval. This is especially important now that the Florida Legislature has put back the statute allowing associations to lien and foreclose on fines. If your association imposes a fine against you for unapproved changes or improvements, you could lose your home. Even without the language, your association could sue you to obtain an injunction forcing you to return your property or unit to its original state. Even more important, once you are labeled a troublemaker by your association they will make your life miserable. Unfortunately they have a lot of power to do just that.

In summary, always submit an application by certified mail, return receipt and, if you do not hear from the association within thirty (30) days, contact them to find out when your application will be reviewed. Make sure to get the approval in writing and do not rely on verbal approvals.

Association Living 101 [Part 1: Your Governing Documents]

I have always wanted to write a book about HOAs and COAs, otherwise known as homeowner associations and condominium associations. I even considered titles like "HOAs for Dummies" or "Welcome to Flori-duh" (inspired by my friend who founded CyberCitizens for Justice). Since my busy professional life makes it unlikely I will ever finish the book, I figured a would start a series of blogs to pass on the information. Let's see how often I get to post the blogs.

Here's the first blog: Know Your Governing Documents!!!

The governing documents of any association (HOA or COA) are the Declarations (also known as Decs, CC&Rs, covenants, deed restrictions, etc.), the Bylaws, the Articles of Incorporation and any published (preferably recorded) Rules & Regulations.

Rule #1:Statutes trump Decs, Decs trump Articles, Articles trump Bylaws and Bylaws trump Rules and Regulations when there is a conflict between the laws and the documents or between the documents themselves.

Exception to the Rule: When determining if the statutes overrule the documents, you have to check the first few paragraphs of the Decs, Bylaws and Articles to see if any of them state the association was formed and organized pursuant to Florida Statute 720, 718, 617 or 607 "as amended from time to time."

This is important because your documents are a contract and disputes are resolved by the courts by applying contract theory. The Florida Constitution prohibits the application of new laws to retroactively change contracts. If the documents do not include those magic words "as amended from time to time," then you have to look to the version of the statute that existed in the year your documents were recorded. This is a rule reinforced by the Florida Supreme Court in the awe of Cohn v. The Grand Condominium, which was created by earlier condo cases.

Exception to the Exception: If a statute is enacted as a matter of public policy, or is remedial or curative, it can still overrule a contract.


Rule #2: What statutes apply? If you live in a HOA, then Fla. Stat. 720 (the HOA Act) applies as well as Fla. Stat. 617 if your HOA is a not-for-profit corporation, and Fla.Stat. 607 if it is a for-profit corporation. Most are non-profit, but not all. Also portions of Fla. Stat. 607 could apply to non-profits if Fla. Stat. 617 is silent on the issue and the specific provision does not affect non-profit status. Other statutes could apply as well, such as the prohibition to publishing "dead beat lists" in the Florida Consumer Credit Practices Act (Fla. Stat. 559).

If you live in a condo, Fla. Stat. 718 (the Condo Act) takes the place of Fla. Stat. 720.

Other statutes govern mobile home parks, co-ops and timeshares.

Townhomes are usually organized as HOAs even though the have the features of a condo.

Rule #3: in HOAs, the restrictions must be recorded in the Declarations. The Bylaws can clarify. The restrictions contained in the Decs, but they can't contain restrictions not in the Decs and cannot grant authority to the HOA not in the superior document, the Declarations. This rule was created by the case of S&T Anchorage v. Lewis. This means, as an example, if the Decs don't grant the HOA authority to impose assessments, then that right cannot be created by putting it in the Bylaws.

This rule does not apply to condo docs. The courts have held condo Bylaws can create new restrictions, like prohibiting pets. The courts only explanation for this has been to proclaim condominium associations "are creatures of statute" meaning they are created by statute. I don't get the logic here, but there are differences between the two types of associations in multiple areas while some sections of 720 and 718 are identical.

Rule #4: For a document to be enforceable against an owner, it must be recorded. This is so the document is "in the chain of title" of the association members and they have notice of the document. Decs and Bylaws are recorded in the official records of the county where the land is located and the Articles are recorded with the State of Florida Division of Corporations (www.sunbiz.org). After 1995 associations were required to record all documents in the county records, so it is not uncommon to see one recording in the county records containing all three documents.

Myth #1: Despite popular belief, the State of Florida does not approve these documents are make any determination if a HOA is mandatory or voluntary. Their job is to record your corporate filing, not rule on the content.

Myth #2: The county clerks do not check documents to see if they are legal or contain necessary provisions and clauses. Their job is to record your associations documents and collect a fee for doing so. Their job is not to give legal advice or make a determination if the language in the documents is legal or if the document has been executed properly. A search of county records in any county will reveal a lot of recorded garbage. There are a number of HOAs claiming to have supreme power over your constitutional rights when, in fact, they have no authority. Condos don't usually have this problem because their documents are not subject to termination by the Marketable Record TitleAct, Fla. Stat. 712. That's a whole other chapter.

Reading and understanding your documents and the statutes are your best defense against a dictatorship of an association. Participation in meetings is the next best defense. Don't wait for a problem to get involved or read the documents. By then it's usually too late.

Stay tuned for more blogs!

Barbara Billiot Stage, Esq.

Does State Law Prevail Over Declarations? - It Depends

The typical answer to any legal question is "it depends." There are no simple answers. Ever.

When dealing with a community association (HOA or condo) and there is a conflict in state law and the governing documents (Declarations, Bylaws, Articles of Incorporation and Rules and Regulations) state law prevails, unless the documents were recorded before the law, but not if the law is remedial, curative or enacted as public policy. There are several cases dealing with this which have established case law or judge-made law, the most recent being Cohn v. The Grand Condominium, but the rule is based on the Florida Constitution, which provides no new law may be applied retroactively to change a contract. The governing documents are contracts between the association and the members.Thus, it depends.

When the documents conflict with each other, Declarations prevail over Articles, Articles prevail over Bylaws And Bylaws prevail over Rules and Regulations.

Associations & Board of Directors

The number of board members is determined by the Declarations, Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws. There must be a minimum of three by state law (Fla. Stat. 617 or 607); however, the governing documents of the association often provide for a range -- three to five or three to nine, etc.

If the documents provide for a minimum of three and some other number as a maximum, the number is increased by a vote. Either the Articles or Bylaws will list the initial number of directors and the document must be amended according to the amendment provisions of the document, meaning it could be either by a board vote or a membership vote.

By law, condo board members cannot be paid a salary and cannot enter into contracts between a business owned by the board member and the association unless the membership is notified and, if anyone objects, the membership ratifies the contract by vote. It is slightly different for HOA board members and the new law, enacted July 1, 2010, has been the subject of debate by association lawyers. My take is the literal meaning, which is no board member cannot "receive financial gain." Benefitting from a contract is financial gain as far as I am concerned

While the association is required to have an annual meeting and an election (the governing documents will provide the month), if there is no quorum of members present at the annual meeting, the election does not occur and the previous board stays in power or can appoint their replacements. The governing documents provide the number of members necessary for a quorum and if no number is specified it is 30%.

This is why it is important for owners to get out and vote!!! Don't complain if you don't participate!!